 |
LA TROBE, CHARLES JOSEPH (1801-1875), lieutenant-governor of
Victoria, |
was born in London on 20 March 1801. His father, the Rev. C. I. La Trobe, was
a Moravian minister who married a Miss Sims of Yorkshire, and their son was
originally educated for the ministry. He, however, did much travelling in
Europe, possibly as a tutor, and in 1829 published his first travel book, The
Alpenstock. This was followed by The Pedestrian (1832), The
Rambler in North America (1835), and The Rambler in Mexico (1836).
While on the way to America with the young Count de Pourtales, to whom La Trobe
appears to have been either a tutor or mentor he met Washington Irving and the
three afterwards travelled through America together. La Trobe's account of these
travels is mentioned above, Irving's was published under the title A Tour on
the Prairies. In this book he gives a revealing description of La Trobe:
"Another of my fellow-travellers was Mr L.; an Englishman by birth but descended
from a foreign stock, and who had all the buoyancy and accomodating spirit of a
native of the Continent. Having rambled over many countries, he had become, to a
certain degree, a citizen of the world, easily adapting himself to every change.
He was a man of a thousand occupations: a botanist, a geologist, a hunter of
beetles and butterflies, a musical amateur, a sketcher of no mean pretensions,
in short, a complete virtuoso; added to which, he was a very indefatigable, if
not always a very successful, sportsman. Never had a man more irons in the fire;
and, consequently, never was a man more busy or more cheerful." After the
conclusion of his American journeys La Trobe was in 1837 sent to the West Indies
to report to the British government on the future education of the recently
emancipated slaves. Apparently this report gave satisfaction, and in February
1839 he received the appointment of superintendent of the Port Phillip district.
He proceeded to Sydney, arrived on 26 July, and stayed about two months; as he
had had no experience of administrative work it was no doubt thought wise to
give him some instruction in the procedure to be followed. He arrived at
Melbourne on 1 October and received an enthusiastic reception. His salary was
£800 a year, but this was soon raised to £1500. He had brought with him a house
in sections, which he erected on the 12½ acres of land on the fringe of the city
now called Jolimont. He bought this at auction at the upset price of £20 an
acre. The residents of Melbourne had agreed among themselves not to bid against
the superintendent, and this reaching the ears of Governor
Gipps (q.v.) at Sydney he was somewhat disturbed about it. La Trobe,
however, was able to convince him that he had acted quite innocently in the
matter.
It is a little difficult to realize the primitive state of Melbourne when La
Trobe arrived. Streets were marked out but they were quite unmade, and indeed in
some cases were little better than bush tracks with stumps of trees in the
middle of them. One of his earliest acts was to set some labourers to work
improving these conditions. The population was about 3000 and was rapidly
growing, there was no drainage, and health conditions were very bad. La Trobe
found it necessary to appoint a board of health to inquire into the causes of
the heavy mortality of the town, and following that steps were taken to form a
municipal corporation. Everything had to be referred to Sydney, where local
affairs often appeared to be more pressing. La Trobe himself had comparatively
little power, and in spite of his invariable courtesy he was not long in losing
his first popularity. But he had really been doing very good work, for finding
that his many requisitions were receiving insufficient attention, he had
persuaded Gipps to come to Melbourne in October 1841 and form his own opinion of
the position. This had had a good effect, but a movement in favour of separation
from New South Wales rapidly developed, and finding La Trobe insufficiently
sympathetic, the Melbourne city council in 1848 sent a petition to the Queen
praying for his removal from his post as superintendent. This was backed up by a
resolution carried at a meeting of 3000 persons. The request was refused, and
the colonial office showed its confidence in La Trobe by appointing him
lieutenant-governor when separation was at last effected. The influx of
population caused by the discovery of gold was the cause of fresh troubles to
him, and he had problems of the most difficult character in connexion with the
conflicting claims of the squatters and the immigrants. His hesitation
concerning the best courses to be followed, led to much abuse of him by the
press for which there was little warrant. Early in 1854 the Argus began
to insert among its advertisements a notice "Wanted a Governor". La Trobe could
stand the strain no longer, resigned his position, and left for England in May
1854. He had been administrator of the government for nearly 15 years, and had
shared fully in the dissatisfaction which was the common fate of all early
governors. Henceforth he lived a retired life in England. Made a C.B. in 1858,
he succeeded in 1864 in obtaining a pension of £333 a year from the British
government. He soon afterwards became blind and died at Litlington near
Eastbourne on 2 December 1875. He was married twice (1) to Sophie de Mt Mollin
who died in 1854 leaving three daughters and a son, and (2) to Susanne de
Mauron, who survived him with two daughters. A granddaughter, La Baronne
Godefroy de Blonay, presented a valuable collection of his papers to the public
library at Melbourne in 1935.
La Trobe was a thoroughly amiable and kindly man, always courteous and
conscientious in carrying out his duties. He was well educated and a capable
writer, as his travel books show, and an excellent amateur draughtsman. A volume
of scholarly verse, The Solace of Song, published anonymously in 1837 and
sometimes attributed to him was not, however, his work, having been written by
his brother, J. A. La Trobe. His private life was irreproachable, but his
administrative work was bitterly criticized during the last few years of his
office, and echoes of this will be found in writers on his period up to 30 years
after his death. Later historians, however, have been able to realize the
extreme difficulty of his position. He could do no more than pass on the
sometimes premature demands of the Port Phillip residents, and then carry out
his instructions. As a result he too often found himself between the hammer and
the anvil. It is possible that he may have deferred too much to Sydney
officials, but it is doubtful whether he could have effected much more than he
did. He certainly acted with decision in twice preventing the landing of
convicts, in 1849 and 1850. Melbourne owes much to him for his part in the
founding of the public library, the university, and the Melbourne hospital. He
encouraged from the beginning the formation of a reservoir to supply Melbourne
with water, and he supported the setting aside of the land for the Botanical,
Fitzroy, and other public gardens.
|