 |
LYNCH, ARTHUR ALFRED (1861-1934), philosophical and
miscellaneous writer, |
was born at Smythesdale near Ballarat, Victoria, in 1861. He never used his
second name. His father, a civil engineer who had fought at the Eureka Stockade,
was Irish, his mother was Scotch. He was educated at Grenville College,
Ballarat, and the university of Melbourne, where he took the degrees of B.A. in
1885 and M.A. in 1887. He also qualified as a civil engineer and practised this
profession for a short period in Melbourne. About 1890 he went to Berlin,
studied scientific subjects and psychology, and going on to London took up
journalism. In 1892 he contested Galway as a Parnellite candidate but was
defeated. In 1899 he was Paris correspondent for a London daily paper and, his
sympathy being with the Boers in the war, he decided to go to South Africa to
see events close at hand. He went as a war correspondent, and making his way to
Pretoria met General Botha, decided to throw in his lot with the Boers, and
organized a troop of Irishmen, Cape colonists and others, whose sympathies were
opposed to the British. He was given the rank of colonel and saw much active
service. From South Africa Lynch went to the United States, and returning to
Paris, stood for Galway in November 1901 as a nationalist candidate and was
elected in his absence. On going to London he was arrested, held in gaol for
eight months, tried for treason before three judges, and on 23 January 1903 was
found guilty and sentenced to be hanged. This sentence was immediately commuted
to penal servitude for life, and a year later Lynch was released on licence by
the Balfour government. In July 1907 he was given a free pardon, and in 1909 was
elected a member of the house of commons for West Clare, Ireland. He held this
seat until 1918, and during the war did good service for the British government.
In his autobiography he claims that he was one of the earliest to fight for
unity of command. He was given the rank of colonel and endeavoured to enlist men
in Ireland for the allied cause without success. After losing his seat in 1918
Lynch, who had qualified as a physician many years before, practised in London
at Haverstock Hill. He died in London on 25 March 1934. He married in 1895 Annie
daughter of the Rev. John D. Powell, a marriage that "never lost its happiness"
(My Life Story, p. 85). He had no children.
Lynch wrote and published a large number of books ranging from poetry to an
attempt to refute Einstein's theory of Relativity. His verse was clever and
satirically Byronic, and his essays and studies show much reading and acuteness
of mind. E. Morris Miller, himself a professor of philosophy, mentions Lynch's
"high reputation as a critical and philosophical writer especially for his
contributions to psychology and ethics" (Australian Literature, p. 273).
His book on Relativity can be read only by people with the necessary
mathematical equipment, but Lynch rated it as one of his best pieces of work.
His publications include Modern Authors (1891), Approaches the Poor
Scholar's Quest of a Mecca (1892), A Koran of Love (1894), Our
Poets (1894), Religio Athletae (1895), Human Documents (1896),
Prince Azreel (1911), Psychology; A New System, 2 vols (1912),
Purpose and Evolution (1913), Sonnets of the Banner and the Star
(1914), Ireland: Vital Hour (1915), Poppy Meadows, Roman
Philosophique (1915), La Nouvelle Ethique (1917), L'Evolution dons
ses Rapports avec l'ethique (1917), Moments of Genius (1919), The
Immortal Caravel (1920), Moods of Life (1921), O'Rourke the
Great (1921), Ethics, an Exposition of Principles (1922),
Principles of Psychology (1923), Seraph Wings (1923), My Life
Story (1924), Science, Leading and Misleading (1927), The Rosy
Fingers (1929), The Case Against Einstein (1932). Some of these
volumes are difficult to procure, and it was not possible to consult all of
them.
Lynch was an able writer with an acute, honest and unusual mind, but he was a
little like the Irish immigrant who asked whether there was a government in this
country "because if so I am against it". There was also a touch of Don Quixote
in him; but if in tilting against windmills he was sometimes unhorsed, he bore
no malice against anyone. He more than once in his writings refers to his love
for his native country, but there is little or no trace of his early environment
in his work. He would probably have had a higher standing had he specialized in
one direction.
|