 |
MATRA, JAMES MARIO (c. 1745-1806), who in 1783 proposed that a
colony should be formed in Australia, |
was born in New York possibly about the year 1745. The name is unusual, and
it has been suggested that he may have belonged to the same family as General
Matra who is mentioned in Boswell's An Account of Corsica. He was a
midshipman on H.M.S. Endeavour with Cook
(q.v.) in 1770 under the name of J. Magra, and may have landed with Banks
(q.v.) and Solander
(q.v.) at Botany Bay. In December 1772 he was British consul at Teneriffe, and
between 1774 and 1779, his father having died, he made various efforts to get to
New York to look after his estate, and failing to obtain a "share of the
allowance granted for the Loyal Americans", was endeavouring in February 1783 to
obtain an appointment to one of the Spanish "consulages". On 28 July 1783 he
wrote to Banks stating that he had heard rumours of two plans for settlements in
the South Seas, one of them in New South Wales, and asking for information about
them, as he had "frequently revolved similar plans in my mind". Matra probably
conferred with Banks and promptly brought forward a plan, dated 23 August 1783,
for a settlement in New South Wales and suggested it could form an asylum for
the unfortunate American loyalists. His primary idea was a settlement of free
men, but in a postscript he discussed the question of transportation. Matra may
have been hoping that if the plan were adopted he would be given an official
position in connexion with it. In 1787, however, he was appointed consul-general
at Tangiers, and during his term he twice conducted negotiations with the Sultan
of Morocco for which he received the thanks of the government. He died at
Tangiers on 29 March 1806.
In 1914 Captain J. H. Watson contributed a paper to the Royal Australian
Historical Society at Sydney, in which he claimed that Matra was the "Father of
Australia". This, however, is claiming too much. In 1779 a committee of the
house of commons was inquiring into the question of transportation, and when
Banks was examined as a witness he stated that Botany Bay appeared to him to be
the most eligible for such a settlement. It is clear from Matra's letter to
Banks in 1783, already quoted, that the question was still being kept alive, and
the chief merit of Matra's suggestion was his belief that a settlement for free
men might be possible. It would certainly have been better if practical farmers
had first been sent out as he suggested, instead of the unfortunate convicts
that Phillip
(q.v.) had to look after, but the fact remains that Matra's plan was not
adopted.
|